neuro-strike weapons

 

https://www.tampabay.com/news/nation-world/2023/11/04/haley-china-neuro-strike-weapons-magnets-brain-nervous-system-politifact/

Toward the Knowledge skills and Abilities (KSAs) of Cognitive Resilience

• In cognitive warfare, the human mind becomes the battlefield. The aim is to change not only what people think, but how they think and act. Waged successfully, it shapes and influences individual and group beliefs and behaviors to favor an aggressor’s tactical or strategic objectives.
• 
  
• -NATO
• 
  
• This kind of warfare is begin waged at all populations, especially inside of Western Liberal Democracies Western Liberal Democracies (WLDs). continuously. 
• 
  
• Most of us are unaware

Cognitive Resilience is an essential survival skill for the 21st century. There are deliberate and unintended consequences of our activites that assuault our abilitty to think, maked ecsion, 

About Cognitive Warfare

1.  There is a field of Study in Psychology and Neuroscience about Resilience, which includes Cognitive Resilience- unrelate to warfare - that is about recovery from difficulty and injury.
2. Cognitive warfare seems to be loosely thrown in as a subset of information warfare as taught by Media and information types -all mention  the importance of  but do not adress any methods to strengthen cognitive Resilience.
3. Western militaries around the world, and NATO, and Anti-western military cooperation groups have developed warfighting doctrine which includes the concept of Cognitive warfare they call Cogwar. they have developed both Offensive and defensive doctrine and tactics. -all mention  the importance of  but do not adress any methods to strengthen cognitive Resilience
4. This warfare is ongoing now, and has been for 15 or 20 years everywhere
5. Aimed internally by authoritarian states to manage the beliefs and thinking of their own populations.
6. Aimed xternally at non-military nations, subgroups, military types, religious and political groups, different age demographics 
7. It appears about 1/3 of any population is highly susceptible to cognitive warfare.

About the state of  ongoing Wars

1. There are Nation states which make no conceptual division between war and peace. 
2. Some have chosen to band together to resist Western liberal Democracy and their cultural  features.
3. There is, at least, an informal and or opportunistic coordination between these groups, 
1. China, Russia, Iran, North Korea
2. Houthis, Hezbollah, Hamas, 
3. They are reaching out to states in Africa
1. CAR
2. Niger
3. South Africa
4. Cognitive warfare is underway in those countries to expand their world Views, including starting Russian Style Troll Farms in Africa, to make their Cogwar more culturally appropriate- we have seen those accounts being trained regarding Ulraine war, and aimed at recruiting foreign fighters to be used in Ukraine
4. Western Liberal Democracies, (WLDs) except for the military and security services, havenot grasped that This group is already at war with us, according to their definitions of war.

About WLDs aiming Cogwar at its own people

1. Cogwar is aimed internally during election cycles, and they are having more impact every US federal cycle. How these activities are funded and what they are doing needs transparency
2. informal grass roots troll networks are emerging with their own sometimes competing agendas
3. This is in addition to the Cogwar aimed at WLD populations from external actors
4. There is an interaction that occurs when candidates and parties create competing platforms, that external Cogwar Agents amplify into raging divergent opposition within the population.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GIS_Arta

Conclusion so far

While I hope that there are classified Cognitive Resilience Developments (CRD) underway with Military members who are working in this area ,there appear to be no structural CRD efforts underway as of 5-29-24

our WLD populations are currently largely defenseless against Cogwar assaults, and about a third of us are highly vulnerable to foreign adversaries that have chosen to be at war with us without notice, and without our knowledge.

Next Steps

There is a great need for a simple cross cultural model of skill sets and low resource methods for developing CRD practices.

Next Steps

1. Develop a a simple cross cultural set of Knowledges, Skills and Abilities (KSAs) for Cognitive Resilience
2. Invest in promotion and practice
3. Incorporate these KSAs into Compliance Domains that are already built for Skill development
• OSHA
• Work Place compliance practices
• Justice Practices
• Title IX requirements
• Education Curriculum
• Professional Continuing Education curriculum,
• Human Resources
• Teachers
• Leadership training
• Military and First responder training
• Leadership training 

• WLDs  have a smattering of informal, disconnected Cognitive Resilience initiatives in development coming from:
• Grass Roots social networks
• Academics

https://www.afghanistantimes.af/awareness-the-only-way-to-counter-cognitive-warfare/

https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2024/02/06/why-cognitive-superiority-is-an-imperative/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_(situational_awareness_system)

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.809003/full

Apophenia and Cognitive Warfare

Apophenia (/æpoʊˈfiːniə/) is the tendency to perceive meaningful connections between unrelated things.^[1] The term (German: Apophänie from the Greek verb ἀποφαίνειν (apophaínein)) was coined by psychiatrist Klaus Conrad in his 1958 publication on the beginning stages of schizophrenia.^[2] He defined it as "unmotivated seeing of connections [accompanied by] a specific feeling of abnormal meaningfulness".^[3][4] He described the early stages of delusional thought as self-referential over-interpretations of actual sensory perceptions, as opposed to hallucinations.^[1 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apophenia

Cognitive Warfare

Notes

China does not separate war from peace - it is all one state of competition. SO they would say thy are in competition with the West, which includes all kinetic war if it furthers competition

Net

Austrian Military Training 

D.I.M.E Cards

Diplomacy

Information 

Military

Economic

Net;

(UnCODE) system for classifying the goals and methods of Cognitive Warfare.

 

Cognitive Warfare takes advantage of novel developments in technology and science to influence how target populations think and act. 

Establishing adequate defense against Cognitive Warfare requires examination of modus operandi to understand this emerging action space. 

• This includes the goals and methods that can be realized through science and technology. 
• Recent literature suggests that both human and nonhuman cognition should be considered as targets of Cognitive Warfare. 
• There are currently no frameworks allowing for a unified way of conceptualizing short-term and long-term Cognitive Warfare goals and attack methods that are domain-and species-agnostic. 
• There is a need for a framework developed through a bottom-up approach that is informed by neuroscientific principles to capture relevant aspects of cognition. 
• The framework should be at a level of complexity that is actionable to decision-makers in war. 

• In this paper, we attempt to cover the existing gap by proposing the Unplug, Corrupt, disOrganize, Diagnose, Enhance (UnCODE) system for classifying the goals and methods of Cognitive Warfare. 

UnCODE System

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Torvald-The system is neurocentric by conceptualizing Cognitive Warfare goals from the perspective of how adversarial methods relate to neural information processing in an individual or society. The UnCODE system identifies five main classes of goals: 

• 1) Eliminating a target's ability to produce outputs, 
• 2) degrading a target's capacity to process inputs and produce outputs, 
• 3) biasing a target's input-output activity, 
• 4) monitoring and understanding the input-output relationships in targets, and
• 5) enhancing a target's capacity and ability to process inputs and produce outputs. 

Methods can be divided in two categories based on access to the target's neural system: 

The UnCODE system is domain-and species-agnostic and allows for interdisciplinary commensurability when communicating attack paths across domains. 

In sum, the UnCODE system is a unifying framework that captures that multiple methods can be used to reach the same Cognitive Warfare goals.

Methods for reaching CogWar goals.

… 

Generations of Warfare

 

• First generation: tactics of line and column; which developed in the age of the smoothbore musket. Lind describes First Generation of warfare as beginning after the Peace of Westphalia in 1648 ending the Thirty Years' War and establishing the state's need to organize and conduct war.^[3] 1GW consisted of tightly ordered soldiers with top-down discipline. These troops would fight in close order and advance slowly. This began to change as the battlefield changed. Old line and column tactics are now considered suicidal as the bow and arrow/sword morphed into the rifle and machine gun.
• Second generation: tactics of linear fire and movement, with reliance on indirect fire. This type of warfare can be seen in the early stages of World War I where there was still strict adherence to drill and discipline of formation and uniform. However, there remained a dependence on artillery and firepower to break the stalemate and move towards a pitched battle.
• Third generation: tactics of infiltration to bypass and collapse the enemy's combat forces rather than seeking to close with and destroy them; and defense in depth. The 3GW military seeks to bypass the enemy, and attack his rear forward, such as the tactics used by German Stormtroopers in World War I against the British and French in order to break the trench warfare stalemate (Lind 2004). These aspects of 3GW bleed into 4GW as it is also warfare of speed and initiative. However, it targets both military forces and home populations.
• The use of fourth-generation warfare can be traced to the Cold War period, as superpowers and major powers attempted to retain their grip on colonies and captured territories. Unable to withstand direct combat against bombers, tanks, and machine guns, non-state entities used tactics of education/propaganda, movement-building, secrecy, terror, and/or confusion to overcome the technological gap.
• Fourth-generation warfare has often involved an insurgent group or other violent non-state actor trying to implement their own government or reestablish an old government over the current ruling power. 
• However, a non-state entity tends to be more successful when it does not attempt, at least in the short term, to impose its own rule, but tries simply to disorganize and delegitimize the state in which the warfare takes place. 
• The aim is to force the state adversary to expend manpower and money in an attempt to establish order, ideally in such a highhanded way that it merely increases disorder, until the state surrenders or withdraws.
• -Concept by Lind

References

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth-generation_warfare

5th Generation Warfare

Fifth-generation warfare (5GW) is warfare that is conducted primarily through non-kinetic military action, such as social engineering, misinformation, cyberattacks, along with emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and fully autonomous systems.

Fifth generation warfare has been described by Daniel Abbot as a war of "information and perception".^[1]

 There is no widely agreed upon definition of fifth-generation warfare,^[2] and it has been rejected by some scholars, including William S. Lind, who was one of the original theorists of fourth-generation warfare.^[3]

Alex P. Schmid said that fifth-generation warfare is typified by its "omnipresent battlefield", and the fact that people engaged in it do not necessarily use military force, instead employing a mixture of kinetic and non-kinetic force.^[7] 

References

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth-generation_warfare

 

CogWar 101

These are notes from various sources, unassembled into what we need: Editor will remove this note when complete:

• 
  
• Cognitive Warfare
• The weaponization of Public opinion by a external entity for the purpose of influenceing public and governmental policy an destabilization public intuitions
• Western
• China  & New Actors
• New Technologies
• Cogwar 2.0

• CogWar focuses on the weaponization of information, including 

System 1 thinking - Fast

System 2 Thinking - Slow

Cognitive Biases

Group level

• Groupthink
• Echo chamber: we share the same information group
• Bubbles

• how adversaries distribute information
• how it is understood, 
• how information influences human 
• thought
• behavior 
• decision making

 OODA decision framework.

The OODA Loop model is a four-point decision loop that supports quick, effective and proactive decision-making. The four stages of the Loop are:

1. Observe – collect current information from as many sources as practically possible.
2. Orient – analyze this information, and use it to update your current reality.
3. Decide – determine a course of action.
4. Act – follow through on your decision.

Warfare process cycles through this loop many times quickly

https://www.mindtools.com/a3ldgz1/ooda-loops

Russia has been studying and applying this for 100 years on its own people, Since 2000 Putin decided He has been a war with the West.

apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1200226.pdf

Troll Farm Set Pieces #1

 The methods used by Russian propaganda described by a Russian journalist:

“I studied at the Faculty of Journalism of Moscow State University. We had a military department. In an atmosphere of secrecy, we were taught special combat propaganda - the art of sowing discord in the ranks of the enemy with the help of disinformation and manipulation of consciousness. Let me tell you, it’s a scary business. I'm not kidding. Combat, or “black,” propaganda allows any distortion of real facts to solve propaganda problems. This is an effective weapon used for the sole purpose of knocking out the enemy’s brains. The "rotten herring" method. The "inverted pyramid" method. The "big lie" method. The “40 to 60” principle. The "absolutely obvious" method. You also know all these methods and techniques. You just don't realize it. As intended. We were taught to use special propaganda techniques against soldiers of the enemy army. Today they are used against the civilian population of our own country. For two years now, reading Russian newspapers or watching television shows, I have noted with interest that people coordinating the distribution and interpretation of news in Russia clearly learned from the same textbook as I have, from the same cheerful colonel or his colleagues. For example, the “rotten herring” method. It works like this. A false accusation is chosen. It is important that it is as dirty and scandalous as possible. For example, petty theft, child molestation, or murder, preferably out of greed work well. The purpose of the “rotten herring” is not to prove the accusation. It’s to cause a wide, public discussion... How it’s unjust and unfair. The human psyche is arranged in such a way that, as soon as the accusation becomes the subject of public discussion, its “supporters” and “opponents”, “experts”, rabid “prosecutors” and ardent “defenders” of the accused inevitably arise. But regardless of their views, all participants in the discussion again and again pronounce the name of the accused in connection with a dirty and scandalous accusation, thus rubbing more and more “rotten herring” into his “clothes”, until finally the “smell” begins to follow him everywhere. The question “killed-stole-seduced or not” becomes the main one when his name is mentioned. Or, for example, the “40 to 60” method invented by Goebbels. It consists in creating media that give 60 percent of their information in the interests of the enemy. On the other hand, having earned his trust in this way, the remaining 40 percent are used for extremely effective, thanks to this trust, disinformation. During World War II, there was a radio station that the anti-fascist world listened to. It was thought to be British. Only after the war did it turn out that it was actually Goebbels’ radio station, which worked on the “40 to 60” principle he developed. The “big lie” method is very effective It is a bit like the “rotten herring” method, but actually works differently. Its essence is to offer the audience such a universal and terrible lie with the highest degree of confidence that it is almost impossible to believe that it's possible to lie about such a thing. The trick here is that a properly composed and well-invented ‘big lie’ causes such a deep emotional trauma in the listener or viewer that it then determines his views for a long time, contrary to any arguments of logic and reason. False descriptions of cruel abuse of children or women work particularly well. Let’s say that the message about a crucified child due to the deep emotional trauma it causes will determine the views of the person who received this information for a long time, no matter how much someone tries to convince him later, using logical arguments. But our cheerful colonel especially revered the method of “absolute evidence”, which delivers, although not fast, but reliable results.”

Source

Translated by @

@NatalkaKyiv

 from a Russian Journalist post on telegram

Pulled off twitter before it disapears